From: Stewart Robert Hinsley <stewart@meden.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Speed of rsbac ?
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 19:53:42 +0100
Next Article (by Date): Re: Plans with RSBAC Stewart Robert Hinsley
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Plans with RSBAC "Paul D. Robertson"
Top of Thread: Speed of rsbac ? Sebastian Andersson
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
In article <19991015095650.F5548@diegeekdie.com>, Sebastian Andersson <bofh@diegeekdie.com> writes >Has there been any benchmarks comparing RSBAC systems with different >policies and a "normal" linux system in terms of speed and memory usage? > >/Sebastian In my experience with B1-B3 functionality UNIXes auditing is what has the most effect on the speed of the system. (Authorisation is a sufficiently small part of the kernel load that doubling or trebling its cost is relatively insignificant. Auditing code can end up in the top ten kernel functions CPU-time wise.) -- Stewart Robert Hinsley - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@morpork.shnet.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Date): Re: Plans with RSBAC Stewart Robert Hinsley
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Plans with RSBAC "Paul D. Robertson"
Top of Thread: Speed of rsbac ? Sebastian Andersson
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]