Re: kernel compile times


From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: kernel compile times
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:13:27 +0200

Next Article (by Author): Re: new bench results Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC) Amon Ott
Top of Thread: kernel compile times Bencsath Boldizsar
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Thanks for your results!

On Son, 08 Apr 2001 Bencsath Boldizsar wrote:
> dual PIII-866, 1G ram , linux 2.4.3+rsbac 1.1.1
> rsbac embergency kernel:
>  time make bzImage -j 4
> real    5m50.371s
> user    5m27.520s
> sys     0m18.820s
> without rsbac:
> real    5m30.336s
> user    5m8.490s
> sys     0m17.960s
> with full/default/ rsbac:
> real    5m54.437s
> user    5m31.720s
> sys     0m18.470s

Your numbers are quite different from my previous benchmark with UP under
2.2.18. While your system time does not increase much, mine did. On the other
hand, your user time increased significantly, while mine did not. Also, the
slowdown is higher in your environment than in mine, despite some optimizations
in v1.1.1.

How many runs did you do? Because of these variations I would like to see at
least 3 runs in single user to be sure. Do you still have your setup, and if
yes, could you possibly make some more runs each?

Amon.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Next Article (by Author): Re: new bench results Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC) Amon Ott
Top of Thread: kernel compile times Bencsath Boldizsar
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.