From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: kernel compile times
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:13:27 +0200
Next Article (by Author): Re: new bench results Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC) Amon Ott
Top of Thread: kernel compile times Bencsath Boldizsar
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Thanks for your results! On Son, 08 Apr 2001 Bencsath Boldizsar wrote: > dual PIII-866, 1G ram , linux 2.4.3+rsbac 1.1.1 > rsbac embergency kernel: > time make bzImage -j 4 > real 5m50.371s > user 5m27.520s > sys 0m18.820s > without rsbac: > real 5m30.336s > user 5m8.490s > sys 0m17.960s > with full/default/ rsbac: > real 5m54.437s > user 5m31.720s > sys 0m18.470s Your numbers are quite different from my previous benchmark with UP under 2.2.18. While your system time does not increase much, mine did. On the other hand, your user time increased significantly, while mine did not. Also, the slowdown is higher in your environment than in mine, despite some optimizations in v1.1.1. How many runs did you do? Because of these variations I would like to see at least 3 runs in single user to be sure. Do you still have your setup, and if yes, could you possibly make some more runs each? Amon. - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Author): Re: new bench results Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Rule Set Based Access Control (RSBAC) Amon Ott
Top of Thread: kernel compile times Bencsath Boldizsar
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]