From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: syslog-ng
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:10:51 +0200
Next Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Sebastian Andersson
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng SZALAY Attila
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Mit, 11 Apr 2001 Bencsath Boldizsar wrote: > Is there any news about syslog-ng? I don't like that all my log files are > clear, because syslog-ng doesn't run;-) > ( I haven't tested syslog-ng with 1.1.1+2.4.3, but I think the situation > is the same as before) Sorry, still no time for testing. However, I tried postfix, which also does not run. There it seems to be a 2.4 incompatibility, which shows as an illegal string. Does syslog-ng run under - 2.4-clean - 2.4-maint - 2.4-rsbac (no) Amon. - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Sebastian Andersson
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng SZALAY Attila
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]