Re: Fwd: A Linux Today story has been mailed to you!

From: K Mitchell Russell <kmrussel@hsc.vcu.edu>
Subject: Re: Fwd: A Linux Today story has been mailed to you!
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:55:47 -0400 (EDT)

Next Article (by Subject): Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Fabrice MARIE
Previous Article (by Subject): Fwd: A Linux Today story has been mailed to you! Amon Ott
Top of Thread: Fwd: A Linux Today story has been mailed to you! Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Amon,

I have no opinion on which model is 'better', the RSBAC or FLASK, but i
sure have enjoyed the cross posting comparing the two.  It has been very
informative and i have learned a great deal about the security design
philosophies in the process.  Keep up the good work.

Regards,
Mitchell

________________________________________________________________________
K. Mitchell Russell, M.D.                        |  kmrussel@hsc.vcu.edu
Research Fellow, MedITAC Research Lab            |  www.meditac.com

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Amon Ott wrote:

> Hi folks!
> 
> This has just been forwarded to me.
> 
> Looks as if we really had to find our own sponsors. Please note the term
> "NAI's principal investigator on the SELinux contract, Stephen Smally". The
> name is later spelled as Smalley.
> 
> Previous messages about how RSBAC compares to SELinux may not be
> accidential...
> 
> Still I believe RSBAC to be stronger in many aspects, e.g. its long time
> stability, strong Access Control Models and the way it combines them.
> 
> Amon.
> 

-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.