From: SZALAY Attila <sasa@pheniscidae.satimex.tvnet.hu>
Subject: Re: syslog-ng
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:33:14 +0200
Next Article (by Subject): Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
--4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! I'm maintain syslog-ng in debian, and I use it in many place. (And I want to try rsbac too, therefore I will test the cooperation in near future. :) On 2001 Apr 11, Amon Ott wrote: >=20 > Sorry, still no time for testing. However, I tried postfix, which also do= es not > run. There it seems to be a 2.4 incompatibility, which shows as an illegal > string. >=20 > Does syslog-ng run under > - 2.4-clean > - 2.4-maint What the difference between this two above? I use syslog-ng without problem in the default (without any 3rd part patch) 2.4.0, 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 kernels. --=20 PGP ID 0x8D143771, /C5 95 43 F8 6F 19 E8 29 53 5E 96 61 05 63 42 D0 GPG ID ABA0E8B2, 45CF B559 8281 8091 8469 CACD DB71 AEFC ABA0 E8B2 A feladatot nem arra kell b=EDzni aki v=E1llalja, hanem arra, aki =E9rt hoz= z=E1. --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE61Ai623Gu/Kug6LIRAhuVAJsHD2XZOgCY43J233rONdr7hgU5UgCeMnzC /GfSCJF0o/vIonaDdPRZD/U= =q6ny -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]