From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re[4]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ?
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:58:47 +0100 (BST)
Next Article (by Subject): Re[4]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: Re[2]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:56:33 +0200 Amon Ott <Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>> wrote= : > > > > --- > >=20 > > The problem Fabrice is having is very similar to the one I have been > > investigating, the two differences being that in my case it is the ordi= nary > > user whose UID is used (this is X 3.3.5), and that the refusal is by RC= ACL- >=20 > I thought that in your case it was ioports access, what is less critical? >=20 If you mean the one I spotted the version problem with then that is now sorted as far as I am concerned (well at least we know the cause and what has to be done ). This was another problem I had not really tackled as I saw no point until the pcmcia issue was resolved. > So what shall we do? Give all users access to kernel memory, if X Support= is > enabled? >=20 No. X is clearly trying to do something special (presumeably for performance reasons, shades of Internet Explorer and its special calls to the Win32 kernel as far as I am concerned). In any case I had tried that and it clearly haad not sorted the problem. I suspect a build issue (e.g. why no roles listed ?). I'll try the install again and try to get full logs of the build. -- Keith Matthews Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,=20 =09=09Oracle development & database administration - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Subject): Re[4]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: Re[2]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]