From: Volckov Konstantin Michailovich <goldhead@altlinux.ru>
Subject: Re: [crispin@WIREX.COM: Linux Security Module Interface]
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:06:41 +0400
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [crispin@WIREX.COM: Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): Your Very Own Cash Machine Set For Life
Next in Thread: Re: [crispin@WIREX.COM: Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi! Here is some intresting forward. > ----- Forwarded message from Crispin Cowan <crispin@WIREX.COM> ----- > > Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:04:12 -0700 > From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@WIREX.COM> > To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM > Subject: Linux Security Module Interface > Approved-By: aleph1@SECURITYFOCUS.COM > Delivered-To: bugtraq@lists.securityfocus.com > Delivered-To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18-1_imnx_5_crispin i686) > X-Accept-Language: en > Reply-To: crispin@WIREX.COM > Organization: WireX Communications, Inc. > > One of the byproducts of the Linux 2.5 Kernel Summit > http://lwn.net/2001/features/KernelSummit/ was the notion of an > enhancement of the loadable kernel module interface to facilitate > security-oriented kernel modules. The purpose is to ease the tension > between folks (such as Immunix and SELinux) who want to add substantial > security capabilities to the kernel, and other folks who want to > minimize kernel bloat & have no use for such security extensions. > > Modules that can be loaded, or not, are the obvious solution, but the > current LKM does not export sufficient hooks to support many security > mechanisms. Thus many current security enhancements end up existing as > kernel patches, which marginalizes their utility by making distribution > problematic. The proposed solution is to enhance the LKM with a variety > of new kernel elements exported to the module interface, so as to > support a reasonable variety of security enhancements. > > We have started a new mailing list called linux-security-module. The > charter is to design, implement, and maintain suitable enhancements to > the LKM to support a reasonable set of security enhancement packages. > The prototypical module to be produced would be to port the POSIX Privs > code out of the kernel and make it a module. An essential part of this > project will be that the resulting work is acceptable for the mainline > Linux kernel. > > The list is open to all. You can subscribe here > http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module or by > sending e-mail to linux-security-module-request@wirex.com with a subject > of "subscribe". > > Crispin > > -- > Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. > Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com > Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org > > ----- End forwarded message ----- 2 Amon: What do you think about it? Good luck, Konstantin ALT Linux kernel24 maintainer. - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [crispin@WIREX.COM: Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): Your Very Own Cash Machine Set For Life
Next in Thread: Re: [crispin@WIREX.COM: Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]