Re: access control by name, not inode

From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: access control by name, not inode
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:26:28 +0100

Next Article (by Subject): acl and more Arkady A Drovosekov
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: access control by name, not inode Jörgen_Sigvardsson
Top of Thread: access control by name, not inode Arkady A Drovosekov
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

On Tuesday, 11. December 2001 02:51, Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
> one could however make an interface name based by resolving the name
> into an inode. (Should not be too much of a problem using ls and awk :)

The user interfaces _are_ name based. Still, the access control decision 
interfaces must remain inode based.

Amon.
--
http://www.rsbac.org
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.