soft mode and v1.1.1-pre4 problem (was: Re: rsbac-v1.1.1-pre4 uploaded)

From: Peter Busser <peter@vpro.nl>
Subject: soft mode and v1.1.1-pre4 problem (was: Re: rsbac-v1.1.1-pre4 uploaded)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:13:58 +0100

Next Article (by Date): Re: soft mode and v1.1.1-pre4 problem (was: Re: rsbac-v1.1.1-pre4 uploaded) Jörgen Sigvardsson
Previous Article (by Date): Re: BSD? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: soft mode and v1.1.1-pre4 problem (was: Re: rsbac-v1.1.1-pre4 uploaded) Jörgen Sigvardsson
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Hi!

> > > Amon. What about some option in /proc? (like /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward).
> > Well, a /proc entry would be ok if it is only present in maintenance mode.
> 
> There are no modules for test decisions in maint mode. And the proc entry would
> of course be access controlled.

Well, in that case it would be nice when this would be (also) a kernel compile
option. It's ok if it is access controled, but when the functionality is not
there, it cannot be activated by accident. This soft mode is mostly useful in
development environments, not in production environments.

I didn't know /proc entries could be access controlled, how does one do that?

BTW, the 2.2.18 kernel doesn't compile with v1.1.1-pre4 when REG modules is
deselected in the kernel configuration. Some symbol is undefined reg...handle
in a function prototype. Sorry, but I can't give more information right now, I
forgot to write the error message down... <shame> <shame>

I think it's some symbol leakage that shouldn't occur when REG modules support
is deselected.

Groetjes,
Peter Busser
-- 
Our continuing mission: To seek out knowledge of C, to explore strange UNIX 
commands, and to boldly code where no one has man page 4.

UNIX is user friendly... it's just picky about who it chooses to befriend.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.