Re: RSBAC vs. postfix

From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: RSBAC vs. postfix
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:42:51 +0200

Next Article (by Date): Re[2]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Previous Article (by Date): RSBAC vs. postfix Stanislav Ievlev
Top of Thread: RSBAC vs. postfix Stanislav Ievlev
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

On Mit, 28 Mär 2001 Stanislav Ievlev wrote:
> Has any try to run postfix under RSBAC kernel with enabled "rsbac net 
> support" option.
> In my system "/usr/lib/postfix/master" cannot bind()  AF_UNIX socket

Must be the same problem as with syslog-ng. I will try them out and see if I
can reproduce it. Until it is fixed, just turn off net support. It is not very
useful anyway.

There will be a 1.1.2 release (hopefully) soon to get some more things done,
e.g. own slab cache and a small RC extension.

After that, the whole socket interception and access control stuff will be
redesigned and then reimplemented for version 1.2.0. It will give us real
network access control.

Amon.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.