Re: syslog-ng


From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: syslog-ng
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:10:51 +0200

Next Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Sebastian Andersson
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng SZALAY Attila
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


On Mit, 11 Apr 2001 Bencsath Boldizsar wrote:
> Is there any news about syslog-ng? I don't like that all my log files are
> clear, because syslog-ng doesn't run;-)
> ( I haven't tested syslog-ng with 1.1.1+2.4.3, but I think the situation
> is the same as before)

Sorry, still no time for testing. However, I tried postfix, which also does not
run. There it seems to be a 2.4 incompatibility, which shows as an illegal
string.

Does syslog-ng run under
- 2.4-clean
- 2.4-maint
- 2.4-rsbac (no)

Amon.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Next Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Fwd: [Linux Security Module Interface] Sebastian Andersson
Top of Thread: syslog-ng Bencsath Boldizsar
Next in Thread: Re: syslog-ng SZALAY Attila
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.