From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re[10]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:43:26 +0100 (BST)
Next Article (by Date): acls and samba Stephen
Previous Article (by Date): AVC in RSBAC Stanislav Ievlev
Next in Thread: Re: Re[10]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:04:40 +0200 Amon Ott <Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>> wrote= : >=20 > This requirement is sure important. However, I never had problems with my= REG > samples. Coould you please test your modules with pre3, when it has come = out? >=20 Will do, however I'll have to wait for a 2.2.18 or 2.2.19 version of course as ext3 in its current form is not available for 2.4 kernels. >=20 > The Makefile has now been changed to modify EXTRAVERSION, if RSBAC is on. >=20 > Do I have to make the version change optional? > =20 Good question, and I'm not sure I know the best answer.=20 One point that occurred to me was that it could be driven from the 'include RSBAC' config setting. I.e. if the user has configured RSBAC in then the extraversion should have the rsbac indicating suffix appended (if not already there) and have it removed (if present) if the user has requested a 'standard' kernel. This would get around the need for 2 source trees but would involve a rather messy config build operation. I'm not really sure I like it as it appears to be 'not really necessary' complexity. It would require the modules to be rebuilt of course, but that might be necessary anyway. -- Keith Matthews Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,=20 =09=09Oracle development & database administration - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Date): acls and samba Stephen
Previous Article (by Date): AVC in RSBAC Stanislav Ievlev
Next in Thread: Re: Re[10]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]