From: Stephen <stephen@tha.net>
Subject: acls and samba
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:36:15 +1000 (EST)
Next Article (by Date): Re: New setreuid() and setresuid() logic Stanislav Ievlev
Previous Article (by Date): Re[10]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Next in Thread: Re: acls and samba Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi I noticed that samba 2.2.0 relys on the acl kernel patches from http://acl.bestbits.at to work with "Unification of Windows 2000 and Windows NT Access control lists (ACLs) with UNIX Access control lists. Allow Windows clients to directly manipulate UNIX Access control entries as though they were Windows ACLs" (as well as present exisiting support for win9x already in samba 2.0.x) I haven't yet looked at this project but it would cause me to be much more likely to use this instead of rsbac because of this. Wondering if anyone had any comments on this? Thanks Stephen - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Date): Re: New setreuid() and setresuid() logic Stanislav Ievlev
Previous Article (by Date): Re[10]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Next in Thread: Re: acls and samba Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]