From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: RE: SMP kernel.
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:35:45 +0200
Next Article (by Date): Re: Several questions steve
Previous Article (by Date): Re: No syslog kernel option Amon Ott
Top of Thread: SMP kernel. "hollace leon"
Next in Thread: RE: SMP kernel. "hollace leon"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 hollace leon wrote: > > > > Do you need 1.1.1/2 support for 2.2.16? > > > yes if you are ready. please tell me where to get it. > > > > I will make one for 1.1.2-final. Why not use 2.2.19? > yes, 2.2.16 is not a must. > but what are the differences between RSBACs on them? The locking code has changed a lot. > what is on the earth the reason that RSBAC hates SMP? It does not hate SMP, it only had some locking and some stack size problems, which are hopefully gone now. SMP locking is a difficult thing, specially when you also have to consider all the locks in the original kernel code. And I still do not have a test SMP system here... Amon. - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Date): Re: Several questions steve
Previous Article (by Date): Re: No syslog kernel option Amon Ott
Top of Thread: SMP kernel. "hollace leon"
Next in Thread: RE: SMP kernel. "hollace leon"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]