RE: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16

From: "Kaladis" <kaladis@gmx.de>
Subject: RE: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:40:16 +0200

Next Article (by Date): RE: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16 Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Date): Re: /etc protection steve
Top of Thread: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16 Amon Ott
Next in Thread: RE: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16 Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

2.2.16 not..

2.2.20 in future would be needed, too. At least by me :)

Because of problems in 2.2.19 I don't think a 1.1.2 version of RSBAC is
neccesarry

- Jörg

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsbac@compuniverse.de [mailto:owner-rsbac@compuniverse.de]On
Behalf Of Amon Ott
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 12:47 PM
To: RSBAC List
Subject: v1.1.2 and kernel 2.2.16


Is this combination still needed?

Amon.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.