Re: RSBAC

From: ao@morpork.shnet.org (A. Ott)
Subject: Re: RSBAC
Date: 02 Nov 1998 21:12:00 +0100

Next Article (by Author): Re: RSBAC ao@morpork.shnet.org (A. Ott)
Previous Article (by Author): Problems with 1.0.5 ao@morpork.shnet.org (A. Ott)
Next in Thread: Re: RSBAC ao@morpork.shnet.org (A. Ott)
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

## Nachricht am 27.10.98 archiviert
## Ursprung: /ao@ao.morpork.shnet.org

On 26 Oct 1998, A. Ott wrote:

> Hi Paul!
> 
> Some time ago, you wrote:
> 
> > Secondly:  Is there any additional protection for the security officer
> > role, or will a root compromise yield a security officer compromise?
> 
> Now there is role protection - I at last realised that su was still  
> working without password (I just didn't use it for that).

Thanks for getting back to me, I've been too busy to follow-up on things 
recently.  I'm hoping to have a lot of time free up soon though.

 > 
> > Lastly:  Is there a mailing list for the discussion of RSBAC?
> 
> Yes, now there is. Mail to majordomo@morpork.shnet.org,
> subscribe rsbac
> in the body.

Great, I think RSBAC is a very interesting tool, and I can't wait to get 
a few days to go back to trying to build under glibc.

> 
> Amon.
> 
> P.S.: 1.0.5 for 2.1.125 is nearly finished, bringing proc support and
>       more stability

More stability is good!  

I've been playing with DG/UX's B2 featureset.  One of the interesting 
things they do is per-context /tmp directories, so that one user's /tmp 
isn't another user's /tmp.  Quite an interesting approach, and I'll have 
to look more deeply at it to see where the problems lie.

Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson
gatekeeper@gannett.com

## CrossPoint v3.11 ##
-
To unsubscribe ao@morpork.shnet.org (A. Ott) from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@morpork.shnet.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.