Re: BSD?


From: Fabrice MARIE <fabrice@celestix.com>
Subject: Re: BSD?
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 15:36:17 +0800

Next Article (by Author): Request for Reference Documents :) Fabrice MARIE
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Logging documentation Fabrice MARIE
Top of Thread: BSD? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: BSD? Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


On Tuesday 27 February 2001 15:31, you wrote:
> How hard on a scale from 1 to 10, would it be to port RSBAC to a
> BSD-flavour? (OpenBSD comes to mind).
> The way I see it is that most of the code is kernel independent, so it
> should not be too hard. It would be kind of cool to make (what the auth=
ors
> claim) the most secure OS even more secure :)

Hello J=F6rgen,

BSD flavors have already http://www.trustedbsd.org/
which is in some ways similar.
I guess they implement definitely less policies
than RSBAC allow you to implement.
A fast look at their page tells me they implement capabilities, MAC, and =
ACLs.

Fabrice.
--=20
Fabrice MARIE
R&D Engineer
Celestix Networks
http://www.celestix.com/

"Silly hacker, root is for administrators"=20
       -Unknown
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Next Article (by Author): Request for Reference Documents :) Fabrice MARIE
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Logging documentation Fabrice MARIE
Top of Thread: BSD? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: BSD? Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.