Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ?

From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:49:02 +0100 (BST)

Next Article (by Subject): Re: Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ? Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): Re[14]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Keith Matthews
Next in Thread: Re: Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ? Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:50:02 +0200 Amon Ott <Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>> wrote=
:

> On Don, 19 Apr 2001 Fabrice MARIE wrote:
> > I'm trying to run Xfree4 while under an RSBAC enabled
> > kernel (2.4.2 with patch-1.1.2pre2, rsbac-v1.1.2pre2 and
> >         rsbac-admin-v1.1.2pre1, using RC,AUTH,ACL modules & support
> >         for X compiled in).
> >=20
> > However, the access is denied with the following message :
> >=20
> > ---
> > Apr 19 14:27:23 fabrice kernel: rsbac_adf_request():
> >   request GET_STATUS_DATA, caller_pid 1283,
> >   caller_prog_name X, caller_uid 0, target-type SCD, tid kmem, at
> >   tr none, value 0, result NOT_GRANTED by ACL
> > Apr 19 14:27:25 fabrice kernel: rsbac_adf_request():
> >   request GET_STATUS_DATA, caller_pid 1283,
> >   caller_prog_name X, caller_uid 0, target-type SCD, tid kmem, at
> >   tr none, value 0, result NOT_GRANTED by ACL
> > ---

The problem Fabrice is having is very similar to the one I have been
investigating, the two differences being that in my case it is the ordinary
user whose UID is used (this is X 3.3.5), and that the refusal is by RC ACL=
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.