From: Keith Matthews <keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re[14]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:04:02 +0100 (BST)
Next Article (by Subject): Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ? Keith Matthews
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: Re[12]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:46:37 +0200 Amon Ott <Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>> wrote= : > >=20 > > Not sure we are talking the same thing here. The current behaviour does > > this _if_ the RSBAC kernel mods are applied, or so I understand. What I > > was (half) proposing was that the extraversion change would be applied > > _if_ the RSBAC mods were applied _and_ RSBAc had been selected in the c= onfig. >=20 > They do it, if patch is applied and CONFIG_RSBAC is selected. The problem= is > that after each change to CONFIG_RSBAC you have to 'touch Makefile' or 'r= m > include/linux/version.h' to get the latter remade. >=20 > Making this automatic would be a dirty hack to the kernel build system. >=20 I did say I didn't much like it. -- Keith Matthews Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,=20 =09=09Oracle development & database administration - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Subject): Re[2]: RSBAC and XFree86-4.0.3 ? Keith Matthews
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: Re[12]: RSBAC v1.1.1 problem Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]