UML+RSBAC = TRUE...?


From: Jörgen Sigvardsson <jorgen.sigvardsson@kau.se>
Subject: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...?
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:03:59 +0100

Next Article (by Subject): Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): uml patch update Jörgen_Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes sir. It compiles after merging of patches and some hand editing. :)
Now I'll just go through all the files that were patched to see if I must fix 
anything else.

I am currently working on linux 2.4.0 code base since there are no 
RSBAC-patches available for linux 2.4.1 yet. Any status on the 2.4.1 patch?

- -- 
Jörgen Sigvardsson, B. Sc.
Lecturer, Computer Science Dept. Karlstad University
Tel: +46-(0)54-700 1786
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6g86gJtcD8rikkmwRAsd8AJwK4xN+g1/lQjlqi6RLK3vKTzMbuwCgiVTH
GhJIEkBDVYuBMkJAvkispyA=
=snoL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Next Article (by Subject): Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Subject): uml patch update Jörgen_Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Amon Ott
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.