Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...?

From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...?
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:53:16 +0100

Next Article (by Subject): Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Previous Article (by Subject): UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Top of Thread: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Next in Thread: Re: UML+RSBAC = TRUE...? Jörgen Sigvardsson
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

On Fre, 09 Feb 2001 Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
> Yes sir. It compiles after merging of patches and some hand editing. :)

Good!

> Now I'll just go through all the files that were patched to see if I must fix 
> anything else.

Please have a close look what syscalls are implemented under arch/um - those
have to be intercepted. Please be careful, because some platform independent
interceptions are in subfunctions, e.g. do_execve.

> I am currently working on linux 2.4.0 code base since there are no 
> RSBAC-patches available for linux 2.4.1 yet. Any status on the 2.4.1 patch?

Just uploaded, together with 1.1.1-pre3. Please try to use this version,
because it contains some fixes and new interceptions for read-write.

Once the system seems to run fine, you can have a look into
/proc/rsbac-info/xstats. It will show which requests actually happen, and which
ones do not. The 0 ones that are usually not 0 mean a missing interception.

Amon.
-
To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to
majordomo@rsbac.org with
unsubscribe rsbac
as single line in the body.

Go to Compuniverse LWGate Home Page.