From: Amon Ott <ao@rsbac.org>
Subject: Re: RSBAC performance in Linux 2.4.10
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:21:22 +0100
Next Article (by Author): Re: mount troubles Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: RSBAC performance in Linux 2.4.10 Amon Ott
Top of Thread: RSBAC performance in Linux 2.4.10 Pontus Lidman
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Wednesday, 16. January 2002 20:18, Pontus Lidman wrote: > Here's my /proc/rsbac-info/stats, before and after the test, in case > it gives you some useful information: > > --- stats_1 Tue Jan 15 18:24:12 2002 > +++ stats_2 Tue Jan 15 19:59:33 2002 > @@ -4,27 +4,27 @@ > Compiled Modules: MAC RC AUTH ACL > All modules active (no switching) > > -Device 08:01 has 303 fd-items and 1 dirty lists > +Device 08:01 has 305 fd-items and 1 dirty lists > Device 00:02 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 08:05 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 08:06 has 28389 fd-items and 0 dirty lists Here is the big problem. How did you come to 28389 fd-items on this device? Guess: MAC is turned on, and smart inherit off. Please try a rsbac_check 1 1 before next timing - it should cut down your fd items and thus speed up the system significantly. If not, tell me more about your .config and your setup. > Device 08:07 has 3757 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 03:01 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 03:05 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > -Device 03:04 has 1227 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > +Device 03:04 has 1220 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 08:17 has 1027 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 00:06 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 00:07 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 22:00 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > Device 00:08 has 0 fd-items and 0 dirty lists > -Sum of 13 Devices with 34703 fd-items > +Sum of 13 Devices with 34698 fd-items > 0 dev-items > 23 ipc-items > 4 user-items > 41 process-items > -Total of 34771 registered rsbac-items, 1 lists dirty > +Total of 34766 registered rsbac-items, 1 lists dirty Altogether far too many items, resulting in huge lists, which are traversed for every single request: > adf_request calls: > -file: 22415, dir: 47910, fifo: 3348, symlink: 2710, dev: 1920, ipc: 691, > scd: 3 5, user: 0, process: 1766 > +file: 344403, dir: 1186637, fifo: 9630, symlink: 19112, dev: 7991, ipc: > 1065, s cd: 57, user: 0, process: 2932 > adf_set_attr calls: > -file: 11010, dir: 663, fifo: 2989, symlink: 0, dev: 1908, ipc: 690, scd: > 0, use r: 0, process: 880 > +file: 17208, dir: 98355, fifo: 5578, symlink: 0, dev: 7979, ipc: 1064, > scd: 0, user: 0, process: 1400 Amon. -- http://www.rsbac.org - To unsubscribe from the rsbac list, send a mail to majordomo@rsbac.org with unsubscribe rsbac as single line in the body.
Next Article (by Author): Re: mount troubles Amon Ott
Previous Article (by Author): Re: RSBAC performance in Linux 2.4.10 Amon Ott
Top of Thread: RSBAC performance in Linux 2.4.10 Pontus Lidman
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]